Twin Peaks Usenet Archive
Subject: Series' Analysis
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Christopher Schanck)
Date: 1990-04-18, 22:39
Reply-to: Christopher Schanck
In article <2195@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> email@example.com (Brian Anderson) writes:
> >In article <1990Apr18.firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com (Gene Edward Johannsen) writes:
>> >>Has a TV series ever been analyzed in this much depth before?
> >Only one other I can think of:
> >The Prisoner
I guess ya'll haven't seen the endless verbiage displayed in the Star
Trek newsgroup -- they get far more (and ridiculous) discussion out
of far less complex plotlines. Note that this is not necessarily a
"You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is
never get involved in a land war in asia..."
--- "The Princess Bride"
Christopher Schanck (firstname.lastname@example.org)