Twin Peaks Usenet Archive

Subject: Re: Misc. things...
From: (John Hallyburton)
Date: 1990-10-09, 11:42
Newsgroups: (Ron Carter) writes...
> >Why is everyone sure that Leo put the drugs under the boards? Bobby is
> >our horticulturist ( a plant expert ) and sure wanted Leo out of the way.

Bobby didn't have any drugs at the time.  Remember Leo in the forest?
If Bobby had that much dope he woulda offered some to Leo just not to
get shot.  Plus the connection between Leo's needing a new pair of boots
is just a bit too obvious.

> >And whate is the connection between the Major and Hank? Vietnam, drugs?

Why does there have to be a connection?  Maybe Hank is just putting on his
good side.  Though it would be interesting to have a 'Nam drug connection...

> >The killer is Leland. Logic as follows: [deleted]

The killer is not Leland.  Logic as follows:  Theresa Banks was killed
elsewhere in the state.  Nobody in Twin Peaks would commit a second similar
crime that close to home.  Of course if you postulate mental illness then
anybody can be guilty...

"Without chemicals he points" is a reference to Leo.  Logic as follows:
"Smiling bag" refers to Jacques as we have seen, "Owls" are likely a
reference to Killer Bob given the owlface in Cooper's dream.  It would
make sense to identify the 3rd of 3 men involved with Laura the night
of her death.  This is all the giant's way of telling Cooper the giant
knows who is involved, and we can expect to see further clarifying (?)
clues in the future.

Maybe Audrey's fan club should form a vigilante posse and rescue her
from OEJs.

  John, speaking for myself