Twin Peaks Usenet Archive


Subject: Re: 2/2 episode
From: russelrd@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Robert Russell)
Date: 1991-02-03, 16:11
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <1991Feb3.201942.25981@watserv1.waterloo.edu> alternat@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) writes:
> >After defending Lynch for months against charges of
> >sexism, I found myself actually so grossed out by the portrayal of
> >women in this episode that I acually actually changed channels
> >(knowing that the episode would be shown again 2 hours later on
> >another station, mind you) because I suddenly just didn't think it
> >was all worth it.
> > 
> >First off, there was the way Shelley reacted to Leo's attack. Why
> >couldn't she get out the door?  Was the lock mechanism supposed to  
> >be too mentally challenging for her? Do you *believe* that!

Obviously, the locks are deadbolts and the kind that
they had required keys to open them, from either side!

As for the lipstick and Lucy, the *funny* pause was just another
of those quirky, *amusing* Twin Peaks deals.

Geesh!

I think that you're just looking for something to gripe about!

-Matt Brockman


Return